amanmeghrajani

Building a Modern AWS Infrastructure: A Cloud Migration Case Study

As a Cloud Architect at a mid-sized SaaS company, I recently completed a large-scale migration to AWS that transformed our infrastructure and development processes. The project spanned six months and resulted in a fully modernized cloud platform that reduced our operational costs by 40% while significantly improving our system reliability and performance.

Initial Infrastructure Assessment

Our starting point presented several technical challenges:

Legacy Infrastructure

  • On-premises data center with physical hardware
  • Monolithic PHP application (500K+ lines of code)
  • MySQL databases (2TB total size)
  • Memcached for caching
  • Nginx load balancers
  • Jenkins CI/CD pipeline
  • NFS for shared storage

Key Pain Points

  • Hardware refresh cycles every 3-4 years
  • Manual scaling during peak loads
  • Complex deployment processes averaging 4-6 hours
  • Backup systems requiring constant maintenance
  • Limited disaster recovery capabilities
  • High operational overhead for infrastructure maintenance

Technical Migration Strategy

Rather than performing a lift-and-shift migration, I developed a phased approach that would gradually modernize our infrastructure while maintaining system stability.

Phase 1: AWS Foundation (Weeks 1-4)

The first phase focused on establishing a solid AWS foundation:

Account Structure:

  • AWS Organizations for multi-account strategy
  • Separate accounts for production, staging, and development
  • AWS Control Tower for account governance
  • AWS SSO for centralized access management

Networking:

  • Transit Gateway for centralized routing
  • VPC design with separate subnet tiers
  • Direct Connect for stable hybrid connectivity
  • Route53 for DNS management

Security Framework:

  • GuardDuty for threat detection
  • Security Hub for centralized security management
  • WAF rules for application protection
  • KMS for encryption management

Phase 2: Data Layer Migration (Weeks 5-8)

The database migration required careful planning to minimize downtime:

Database Strategy:

  • Source: MySQL 5.7 on-premises
  • Target: Amazon Aurora MySQL 8.0
  • Size: 2TB total data
  • Tables: 450+
  • Active connections: ~5000

Migration Process:

  1. Initial Schema Assessment
    • Analyzed schema compatibility
    • Identified deprecated features
    • Mapped data types
    • Evaluated foreign key relationships
  2. Performance Optimization
    • Implemented proper indexing
    • Optimized large tables
    • Removed redundant indexes
    • Analyzed query patterns
  3. Migration Implementation sqlCopy-- Example of schema optimization ALTER TABLE large_transactions ADD INDEX idx_date_status (transaction_date, status), DROP INDEX idx_unused_1, MODIFY COLUMN status ENUM('pending', 'completed', 'failed')
  4. Replication Setup
    • Configured AWS DMS replication instances
    • Set up continuous replication
    • Monitored replication lag
    • Validated data consistency

Phase 3: Application Modernization (Weeks 9-16)

This phase involved breaking down the monolith into manageable services:

Service Architecture:

  1. API Layer
    • API Gateway for request routing
    • Lambda for serverless functions
    • ECS for containerized services
  2. Frontend
    • S3 for static hosting
    • CloudFront for content delivery
    • React application in containers
  3. Background Processing
    • SQS for job queues
    • Step Functions for workflows
    • EventBridge for scheduling

Container Strategy:

dockerfileCopy# Optimized container image
FROM public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:2
RUN yum update -y && yum install -y \
    php8.1 \
    php8.1-fpm \
    php8.1-mysql \
    php8.1-redis \
    nginx

# Application setup
COPY ./app /var/www/html
COPY ./config/php.ini /etc/php.ini
COPY ./config/nginx.conf /etc/nginx/nginx.conf

# Performance optimization
RUN php-fpm -t && nginx -t

ECS Task Definitions:

jsonCopy{
  "family": "app-service",
  "containerDefinitions": [
    {
      "name": "app",
      "image": "app:latest",
      "memory": 1024,
      "cpu": 512,
      "portMappings": [
        {
          "containerPort": 80,
          "protocol": "tcp"
        }
      ],
      "environment": [
        {
          "name": "APP_ENV",
          "value": "production"
        }
      ],
      "logConfiguration": {
        "logDriver": "awslogs",
        "options": {
          "awslogs-group": "/ecs/app-service",
          "awslogs-region": "us-east-1",
          "awslogs-stream-prefix": "app"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Phase 4: Caching and Performance (Weeks 17-20)

Implemented a multi-layer caching strategy:

  1. Application Cache
    • ElastiCache for Redis
    • Multiple cache nodes
    • Read replicas for scaling
  2. Content Cache
    • CloudFront with custom headers
    • S3 for static assets
    • Lambda@Edge for dynamic content
  3. API Cache
    • API Gateway caching
    • DAX for DynamoDB
    • Custom cache invalidation

Cache Configuration:

yamlCopyCacheCluster:
  Type: AWS::ElastiCache::ReplicationGroup
  Properties:
    ReplicationGroupId: !Sub ${AWS::StackName}-redis
    ReplicationGroupDescription: Redis cluster for session storage
    Engine: redis
    CacheNodeType: cache.r6g.large
    NumCacheClusters: 2
    AutomaticFailoverEnabled: true
    MultiAZ: true

Phase 5: Monitoring and Optimization (Weeks 21-24)

Implemented comprehensive monitoring:

  1. Infrastructure Monitoring
    • CloudWatch metrics and alarms
    • Custom metrics for business KPIs
    • Automated scaling policies
  2. Application Monitoring
    • X-Ray for distributed tracing
    • CloudWatch Logs Insights
    • Custom dashboards
  3. Cost Monitoring
    • AWS Cost Explorer
    • Budget alerts
    • Resource tagging strategy

Custom Monitoring Example:

pythonCopydef publish_custom_metrics():
    cloudwatch = boto3.client('cloudwatch')
    
    metrics = {
        'active_users': get_active_users(),
        'transaction_rate': calculate_transaction_rate(),
        'error_rate': get_error_rate(),
        'response_time': get_average_response_time()
    }
    
    for name, value in metrics.items():
        cloudwatch.put_metric_data(
            Namespace='CustomMetrics',
            MetricData=[{
                'MetricName': name,
                'Value': value,
                'Unit': 'Count'
            }]
        )

Results and Metrics

Performance Improvements

  • Page load time: 2.8s → 0.9s
  • API response time: 500ms → 120ms
  • Database query time: 350ms → 85ms
  • Cache hit rate: 75% → 95%

Operational Improvements

  • Deployment time: 4 hours → 10 minutes
  • System uptime: 98% → 99.99%
  • Incident response time: 2 hours → 15 minutes
  • Release frequency: Weekly → Daily

Cost Optimization

  • Infrastructure costs: -40%
  • Operational overhead: -60%
  • Development efficiency: +45%
  • Resource utilization: +65%

Technical Architecture Details

Auto-scaling Configuration

yamlCopyAutoScalingGroup:
  Type: AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup
  Properties:
    MinSize: 2
    MaxSize: 10
    DesiredCapacity: 2
    HealthCheckType: ELB
    HealthCheckGracePeriod: 300
    LaunchTemplate:
      LaunchTemplateId: !Ref LaunchTemplate
      Version: !GetAtt LaunchTemplate.LatestVersionNumber

Security Implementation

jsonCopy{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Sid": "RestrictedS3Access",
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": [
        "s3:GetObject",
        "s3:PutObject"
      ],
      "Resource": [
        "arn:aws:s3:::app-bucket/*"
      ],
      "Condition": {
        "StringEquals": {
          "aws:PrincipalTag/Environment": "production"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Future Improvements

Currently planning several enhancements:

  1. Serverless Expansion
    • Converting more services to Lambda
    • Implementing Step Functions
    • Using EventBridge for event routing
  2. Advanced Monitoring
    • AI-driven anomaly detection
    • Predictive scaling
    • ML-based capacity planning
  3. Global Infrastructure
    • Multi-region deployment
    • Global Accelerator implementation
    • Regional data replication

Technical Implementation Details

The migration required deep technical knowledge across multiple AWS services and best practices. Here’s a detailed look at some key implementations:

Service Discovery Pattern

yamlCopyServiceDiscovery:
  Type: AWS::ServiceDiscovery::PrivateDnsNamespace
  Properties:
    Name: !Sub service.${AWS::StackName}.local
    Vpc: !Ref VPC

ServiceRegistry:
  Type: AWS::ServiceDiscovery::Service
  Properties:
    Name: api
    DnsConfig:
      NamespaceId: !Ref ServiceDiscovery
      DnsRecords:
        - Type: A
          TTL: 300

Database Optimization

sqlCopy-- Partitioning strategy for large tables
CREATE TABLE events (
    id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    event_type VARCHAR(50),
    event_date DATE,
    payload JSON,
    PRIMARY KEY (id, event_date)
)
PARTITION BY RANGE (TO_DAYS(event_date)) (
    PARTITION p_2023 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DAYS('2024-01-01')),
    PARTITION p_2024 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DAYS('2025-01-01')),
    PARTITION p_future VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE
);

Building a Modern AWS Infrastructure: A Cloud Migration Case Study

Published on: December 14, 2024

As a Cloud Architect at a mid-sized SaaS company, I recently completed a large-scale migration to AWS that transformed our infrastructure and development processes. The project spanned six months and resulted in a fully modernized cloud platform that reduced our operational costs by 40% while significantly improving our system reliability and performance.

Initial Infrastructure Assessment

Our starting point presented several technical challenges:

Legacy Infrastructure

  • On-premises data center with physical hardware
  • Monolithic PHP application (500K+ lines of code)
  • MySQL databases (2TB total size)
  • Memcached for caching
  • Nginx load balancers
  • Jenkins CI/CD pipeline
  • NFS for shared storage

Key Pain Points

  • Hardware refresh cycles every 3-4 years
  • Manual scaling during peak loads
  • Complex deployment processes averaging 4-6 hours
  • Backup systems requiring constant maintenance
  • Limited disaster recovery capabilities
  • High operational overhead for infrastructure maintenance

Technical Migration Strategy

Rather than performing a lift-and-shift migration, I developed a phased approach that would gradually modernize our infrastructure while maintaining system stability.

Phase 1: AWS Foundation (Weeks 1-4)

The first phase focused on establishing a solid AWS foundation:

Account Structure:

  • AWS Organizations for multi-account strategy
  • Separate accounts for production, staging, and development
  • AWS Control Tower for account governance
  • AWS SSO for centralized access management

Networking:

  • Transit Gateway for centralized routing
  • VPC design with separate subnet tiers
  • Direct Connect for stable hybrid connectivity
  • Route53 for DNS management

Security Framework:

  • GuardDuty for threat detection
  • Security Hub for centralized security management
  • WAF rules for application protection
  • KMS for encryption management

Phase 2: Data Layer Migration (Weeks 5-8)

The database migration required careful planning to minimize downtime:

Database Strategy:

  • Source: MySQL 5.7 on-premises
  • Target: Amazon Aurora MySQL 8.0
  • Size: 2TB total data
  • Tables: 450+
  • Active connections: ~5000

Migration Process:

  1. Initial Schema Assessment
    • Analyzed schema compatibility
    • Identified deprecated features
    • Mapped data types
    • Evaluated foreign key relationships
  2. Performance Optimization
    • Implemented proper indexing
    • Optimized large tables
    • Removed redundant indexes
    • Analyzed query patterns
  3. Migration Implementation sqlCopy-- Example of schema optimization ALTER TABLE large_transactions ADD INDEX idx_date_status (transaction_date, status), DROP INDEX idx_unused_1, MODIFY COLUMN status ENUM('pending', 'completed', 'failed')
  4. Replication Setup
    • Configured AWS DMS replication instances
    • Set up continuous replication
    • Monitored replication lag
    • Validated data consistency

Phase 3: Application Modernization (Weeks 9-16)

This phase involved breaking down the monolith into manageable services:

Service Architecture:

  1. API Layer
    • API Gateway for request routing
    • Lambda for serverless functions
    • ECS for containerized services
  2. Frontend
    • S3 for static hosting
    • CloudFront for content delivery
    • React application in containers
  3. Background Processing
    • SQS for job queues
    • Step Functions for workflows
    • EventBridge for scheduling

Container Strategy:

dockerfileCopy# Optimized container image
FROM public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:2
RUN yum update -y && yum install -y \
    php8.1 \
    php8.1-fpm \
    php8.1-mysql \
    php8.1-redis \
    nginx

# Application setup
COPY ./app /var/www/html
COPY ./config/php.ini /etc/php.ini
COPY ./config/nginx.conf /etc/nginx/nginx.conf

# Performance optimization
RUN php-fpm -t && nginx -t

ECS Task Definitions:

jsonCopy{
  "family": "app-service",
  "containerDefinitions": [
    {
      "name": "app",
      "image": "app:latest",
      "memory": 1024,
      "cpu": 512,
      "portMappings": [
        {
          "containerPort": 80,
          "protocol": "tcp"
        }
      ],
      "environment": [
        {
          "name": "APP_ENV",
          "value": "production"
        }
      ],
      "logConfiguration": {
        "logDriver": "awslogs",
        "options": {
          "awslogs-group": "/ecs/app-service",
          "awslogs-region": "us-east-1",
          "awslogs-stream-prefix": "app"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Phase 4: Caching and Performance (Weeks 17-20)

Implemented a multi-layer caching strategy:

  1. Application Cache
    • ElastiCache for Redis
    • Multiple cache nodes
    • Read replicas for scaling
  2. Content Cache
    • CloudFront with custom headers
    • S3 for static assets
    • Lambda@Edge for dynamic content
  3. API Cache
    • API Gateway caching
    • DAX for DynamoDB
    • Custom cache invalidation

Cache Configuration:

yamlCopyCacheCluster:
  Type: AWS::ElastiCache::ReplicationGroup
  Properties:
    ReplicationGroupId: !Sub ${AWS::StackName}-redis
    ReplicationGroupDescription: Redis cluster for session storage
    Engine: redis
    CacheNodeType: cache.r6g.large
    NumCacheClusters: 2
    AutomaticFailoverEnabled: true
    MultiAZ: true

Phase 5: Monitoring and Optimization (Weeks 21-24)

Implemented comprehensive monitoring:

  1. Infrastructure Monitoring
    • CloudWatch metrics and alarms
    • Custom metrics for business KPIs
    • Automated scaling policies
  2. Application Monitoring
    • X-Ray for distributed tracing
    • CloudWatch Logs Insights
    • Custom dashboards
  3. Cost Monitoring
    • AWS Cost Explorer
    • Budget alerts
    • Resource tagging strategy

Custom Monitoring Example:

pythonCopydef publish_custom_metrics():
    cloudwatch = boto3.client('cloudwatch')
    
    metrics = {
        'active_users': get_active_users(),
        'transaction_rate': calculate_transaction_rate(),
        'error_rate': get_error_rate(),
        'response_time': get_average_response_time()
    }
    
    for name, value in metrics.items():
        cloudwatch.put_metric_data(
            Namespace='CustomMetrics',
            MetricData=[{
                'MetricName': name,
                'Value': value,
                'Unit': 'Count'
            }]
        )

Results and Metrics

Performance Improvements

  • Page load time: 2.8s → 0.9s
  • API response time: 500ms → 120ms
  • Database query time: 350ms → 85ms
  • Cache hit rate: 75% → 95%

Operational Improvements

  • Deployment time: 4 hours → 10 minutes
  • System uptime: 98% → 99.99%
  • Incident response time: 2 hours → 15 minutes
  • Release frequency: Weekly → Daily

Cost Optimization

  • Infrastructure costs: -40%
  • Operational overhead: -60%
  • Development efficiency: +45%
  • Resource utilization: +65%

Technical Architecture Details

Auto-scaling Configuration

yamlCopyAutoScalingGroup:
  Type: AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup
  Properties:
    MinSize: 2
    MaxSize: 10
    DesiredCapacity: 2
    HealthCheckType: ELB
    HealthCheckGracePeriod: 300
    LaunchTemplate:
      LaunchTemplateId: !Ref LaunchTemplate
      Version: !GetAtt LaunchTemplate.LatestVersionNumber

Security Implementation

jsonCopy{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Sid": "RestrictedS3Access",
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": [
        "s3:GetObject",
        "s3:PutObject"
      ],
      "Resource": [
        "arn:aws:s3:::app-bucket/*"
      ],
      "Condition": {
        "StringEquals": {
          "aws:PrincipalTag/Environment": "production"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Future Improvements

Currently planning several enhancements:

  1. Serverless Expansion
    • Converting more services to Lambda
    • Implementing Step Functions
    • Using EventBridge for event routing
  2. Advanced Monitoring
    • AI-driven anomaly detection
    • Predictive scaling
    • ML-based capacity planning
  3. Global Infrastructure
    • Multi-region deployment
    • Global Accelerator implementation
    • Regional data replication

Technical Implementation Details

The migration required deep technical knowledge across multiple AWS services and best practices. Here’s a detailed look at some key implementations:

Service Discovery Pattern

yamlCopyServiceDiscovery:
  Type: AWS::ServiceDiscovery::PrivateDnsNamespace
  Properties:
    Name: !Sub service.${AWS::StackName}.local
    Vpc: !Ref VPC

ServiceRegistry:
  Type: AWS::ServiceDiscovery::Service
  Properties:
    Name: api
    DnsConfig:
      NamespaceId: !Ref ServiceDiscovery
      DnsRecords:
        - Type: A
          TTL: 300

Database Optimization

sqlCopy-- Partitioning strategy for large tables
CREATE TABLE events (
    id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    event_type VARCHAR(50),
    event_date DATE,
    payload JSON,
    PRIMARY KEY (id, event_date)
)
PARTITION BY RANGE (TO_DAYS(event_date)) (
    PARTITION p_2023 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DAYS('2024-01-01')),
    PARTITION p_2024 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DAYS('2025-01-01')),
    PARTITION p_future VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE
);

Building on Solid Principles

Building a cloud infrastructure is much like constructing a skyscraper – it requires a rock-solid foundation. Through this migration, I discovered that the true strength of cloud architecture lies not just in the technologies we choose, but in the principles that guide our decisions.

Security formed the bedrock of our architecture. Every piece of data, whether at rest or in motion, was encrypted using AWS KMS. Access controls followed the principle of least privilege so strictly that even I had to request elevations for certain operations. Our regular security audits became not just checkboxes to tick, but opportunities to strengthen our defenses.

The power of automation transformed our operations. Infrastructure as Code became our source of truth, with every change documented and version-controlled. Our testing pipelines caught issues before they reached production, and our monitoring systems gave us insights we never had before. Gone were the days of manual configurations and midnight deployments.

Cost optimization proved to be an art form in itself. Instead of the traditional approach of overprovisioning for peak loads, we implemented dynamic scaling that responded to actual demand. Our Reserved Instance strategy alone saved us thousands monthly, and our right-sizing efforts turned waste into efficiency.

Performance wasn’t just about speed – it was about reliability at scale. Multi-AZ deployments ensured our services stayed available even when an entire availability zone went dark. Our caching strategy evolved from a simple Redis instance to a sophisticated multi-layer system that significantly reduced database load.

Perhaps most importantly, we built reliability into every layer. Our fault-tolerant design meant that individual component failures no longer kept me up at night. Automated failover became so seamless that most users never noticed when things went wrong behind the scenes.

These principles weren’t just theoretical concepts – they were battle-tested strategies that proved their worth time and time again. As our cloud infrastructure matured, these foundations gave us the confidence to innovate faster and think bigger.

Recent Posts